r/WhitePeopleTwitter 13d ago

Something something SiLeNt MaJoRiTy

Post image
37.2k Upvotes

932 comments sorted by

3.6k

u/Zealousideal_Fuel_23 13d ago

2004 election was held during the 4 months that the Iraq War appeared to be going well.

1.5k

u/gfh110 13d ago

It was the first time I was able to vote and I unfortunately fell for my dad's spiel of "You don't switch horses in the middle of the race." Race here meaning "war."

888

u/dudinax 13d ago

What if the horse started the race, and the race was killing hundreds of thousands of people, and the horse lied about why it started the race?

Might want to switch horses.

293

u/808ocd 13d ago

shouldve had the horse tried for war crimes

103

u/xero_peace 13d ago

Probably best just to make glue and pet food out of the horse if it's that useless.

→ More replies (24)

18

u/LumpyJones 13d ago

Warhorse crimes...

Becky Apples is the worst

→ More replies (1)

6

u/soodeau 13d ago

Race crimes though because it’s a race, not a war

Race crimes sounds bad too

→ More replies (6)

32

u/FlashMcSuave 13d ago

Also, the horse brought evangelical prayer sessions into the white house and has a messianic complex.

Really should have switched horses.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/funkeymonk 13d ago

Could be worse. Somebody could set the horse loose in a hospital

16

u/EnlightenedSinTryst 13d ago

There it is

3

u/hoitey_toity 13d ago

I was looking for it—and hoping it wasn’t there so I could be the one to say it—but alas, there it is.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/thatthatguy 13d ago

Yes. We learned that regardless of whether we are in a race or not sometimes it is necessary to stop the horse, dismount, quietly lead the horse behind the shed, and shoot it for the safety of ourselves and all the other horses. Sadly, we can’t seem to get the horse to give up the gun and the metaphor is starting to fall apart.

→ More replies (9)

23

u/secretbudgie 13d ago

I thought it was mid-stream, like when fording a river on your way to Oregon or something

7

u/1998_2009_2016 13d ago

Yes this is the correct saying

→ More replies (1)

12

u/SafewordisJohnCandy 13d ago

Same here. 6 months after the election my best friend was killed along with another Marine in Iraq. Would he still be alive had Kerry won? I don't know, I'd like to think maybe. But hindsight is 20/20 and I supported a lot of stupid shit back then.

89

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

60

u/Masta0nion 13d ago edited 13d ago

Absolutely. We were in the throes of nationalism in 2004 by them lying to the population about WMDs.

2000 Brooks Brothers Riot changed our timeline. And Gore and the Dems conceded “for the good of the nation.”

At least that shit would never fly today. ..I hope. They tried in 2020, but we weren’t having that.

17

u/XkF21WNJ 13d ago

Fuck, no wonder they find it so convincing when someone says the vote was stolen.

They know it can be done.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/DapperStatistician59 13d ago

The practice J6. And now the did a dry run with Trump. DeSantis is probably their closer.

17

u/IBAZERKERI 13d ago

Desantis is looking dead in the water at the moment. his only shot is trump straight being locked up in jail

11

u/Cdf12345 13d ago

Careful, that’s what the media said about trump too

8

u/Diarygirl 13d ago

Trump didn't have a track record though, and some people thought "What's the worst that could happen?" With DeSantis we know exactly what kind of president he'd be.

9

u/clockdivide55 13d ago

Don't underestimate how many fascist supporters go to the polls.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/DapperStatistician59 13d ago

God I hope you are right.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/dj_narwhal 13d ago

The Iraq war or the Electoral College?

→ More replies (3)

17

u/monkeypu 13d ago

Reminds me of this ditty: 'I voted for Nixon in '72 'cause you don't change Dicks in the middle of a screw.'

→ More replies (1)

4

u/dirtmother 13d ago

"Don't switch Dicks in the middle of the screw! Vote Nixon 1962!"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (22)

189

u/Lady_von_Stinkbeaver 13d ago

https://preview.redd.it/koswk2xhka2b1.jpeg?width=810&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=eb732a5a0f49e687f76a33dc8a61a24c1b7dba67

The Swiftboaters were such a crock of shit that Republicans were even using it to mean slandering your opponent just a few years later.

93

u/Nimonic 13d ago

The swiftboat thing was utterly absurd, looking on from Europe. A guy who lead men in the Vietnam War, getting three (!) Purple Hearts for it, was portrayed as a weak coward, while his draft-dodging opponent was portrayed as a hero.

And he didn't draft dodge for noble and moral reasons, like being against the war or refusing to kill.

47

u/MyAltimateIsCharging 13d ago

Honestly I wouldn't have issue with Trump or any American draft dodging Vietnam if they then didn't go on to be a chicken hawk and try to build a tough guy warrior brand. If you're going to be an authoritarian who advocates for war, at least walk the walk first.

18

u/tenninjas242 13d ago

Yeah that's the thing... The whole point of being in charge of that kind of authoritarian regime is so you can send someone else's kids to die.

15

u/ThePizzaB0y 13d ago

For profit of course

→ More replies (1)

6

u/NapoleonBlownapart9 13d ago

Remember, he told Howard Stern that his “personal Vietnam was having so much sex and trying to dodge STDs”. What a fat sack of anal mucus.

→ More replies (2)

17

u/meep_meep_mope 13d ago edited 13d ago

I was working HVAC that year and guy I worked for would blast Rush Limbaugh in his truck all day. Dude was also a vet and I asked him about this very point. He thought it was funny that you could be a war hero and still be called a pussy.

Sometimes even Limbaugh would go too far and he'd change the station.

Well he has three daughters now and women aren't people anymore, they're baby incubators, so I'm sure that joke was hilarious.

73

u/2pacalypso 13d ago

It's fuckin ludicrous how shameless these motherfuckers are

→ More replies (1)

18

u/friendfromsp 13d ago edited 13d ago

He wasn't the worst president in history. At least two other Republicans were worse (Reagan, Trump)

Edit: see, the fun part was I said at least two other Republicans. They have made horrible presidents so many times that of course there would be more.

17

u/ABigSoftE 13d ago

I peg Jackson Johnson and Wilson as the worst.

Jackson: literally ignored a supreme court ruling because he wouldn't be able to genocide indigenous folks as hard as he wanted to, establishing absolutely horrifying precedents that frankly it is a fucking miracle proceeded to go uninvoked by others following him, which is basically just the theme of how he did everything as president. Specifically when he nearly hanged the entire state government of south carolina during the nullification crisis, and when he literally crashed the national economy out of spite for his political opponents, yes yes jokes about debt ceiling abound, Jackson didn't just do that out of sheer incompetence, he maliciously did it on purpose to kill the first iteration of the national banking system because his enemies were overrepresented in the banking sector of his day.

Johnson: Abraham Lincoln's greatest sin was dying before Andrew fucking Johnson was out of office with him for the absolute shitton of damage he did to reconstruction. You know you done fucked up when you're the first president in history to get a veto overturned in congress because of how blatantly you're sabotaging the national process of healing and justice in the wake of a civil war.

Wilson: Literally every single foreign policy entanglement America presently strains under and that it had strained under over the past over a hundred years now can be traced back to how this fucklenut conducted himself about WWI. To say nothing about the significant hand he played in fermenting a KKK renaissance through the unethical use of his historian credentials, his resegregating government offices, and infamously his showing literal lost cause propoganda in the fucking white house. Every shitbag president and cabinet member who came after is arguably so bad because they were marching to this guy's tune on foreign policy conduct and causing domestic social unrest.

10

u/Born-Category-8806 13d ago

I would rate Reagan's pouring napalm on race relations while kicking off the economic policies that have transferred nearly all new wealth upwards with those three. The current major internal issues in the US all were made significantly worse by his presidency.

While I hate how Trump acts and what he represents, his typical outspend/legally outmaneuver his business partners into bag holders didn't specifically translate into a competent leader or president. He certainly threw gas on race class and other issues happening but it doesn't strike me as the same levels of actual impact/change.

The Republican party leaders, McConnell et all deserve most of the credit for the actual economic and legal damage done during his time, and I can't think of anything spectacularly new. It was business as usual regardless of who is president for them. I imagine his timing/luck picking SCJs and the hard swing right will be the most lasting impact of his legacy and presidency on the country

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/stiiii 13d ago

Well they have certainly done a good job. I doubt anyone thinks Bush was the worst any more!

5

u/internet_commie 13d ago

Well, he was back then. Now, more like second worst.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

74

u/ericwphoto 13d ago

At the time I thought it was insane that people would still support Bush after going into Iraq. It was pretty obvious to me, and should have been to anyone paying attention, that invading Iraq was nothing more than a pet project for Bush/Cheney. The reasoning for invading them was completely disingenuous. I thought it couldn't get much worse than Bush. I couldn't have been more wrong.

12

u/MadRaymer 13d ago

Don't forget that the right really played up the social issues in 2004 too. It might be hard to remember, but people were a lot less comfortable with gay marriage back then. Bush might have got a lot of votes that weren't necessarily a referendum on the war, but from fear over rapid change. Even when Obama first ran in 2008, he wasn't openly supporting gay marriage yet. Biden actually came out in support of that ahead of him (though not by very long).

36

u/808ocd 13d ago

never forget the largest defense corporations (raytheon, lockheed, boeing, haliburton and the ones that bush and cheney were invested in) all increased their share prices by 1000% at some point during the wars.

they grifted the nation, murdered a million+, carted off TRILLIONS of middle class wealth, all while riding a wave of nationalism which eventually became maga.

thats what nationalism gets you.

18

u/60k_dining-room_bees 13d ago

I felt like I was going crazy at the time. Why were heading to Iraq? WTF di that have to do with anything? But everyone else seemed to understand something I didn't, and at the time I was so hella busy that I could barely pay attention to the world around me outside my major.

Then I watched some report thing on how Bush/Cheney used a childish word association that planted in people's heads the idea that Iraq and Afghanistan were linked despite no real reason to think so, and I never underestimated American stupidity again. I don't think I realized before that people wanted to stick their head in the sand.

11

u/Schrutes_Yeet_Farm 13d ago

2004 election was basically that episode of family guy where Lois wins the election by repeatedly saying "9/11" while the crowd cheers

18

u/ericwphoto 13d ago

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc...... should be in prison right now. How many needless deaths, how much ptsd, how many maimed soldiers? For what? Oil? revenge for Bush senior? It certainly wasn't because they hated us for our freedom. Not to mention the fucking "Patriot" Act.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

13

u/RealzLlamaz 13d ago

and it was the election after 9/11.

Not surprised that the incumbent would be voted in after a US-shocking event.

46

u/Peter_Easter 13d ago

That was Bush Jr's second term too, which he never would have won if the electoral college didn't give him his first term.

81

u/SidewaysGoose57 13d ago

Not the Electoral College. The Supreme Court stopped the recount in Florida.

31

u/tommytraddles 13d ago

The Brooks Brothers Riot was a successful coup d'etat.

20

u/Fordy_Oz 13d ago

They had a hard decision to make and ultimately decided the fairest way to call the election was to determine which candidate's brother was the governor of Florida.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/kevlarcardhouse 13d ago

And before we knew it was started on a lie.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/HardcoreThorX 13d ago

That we were told it was going well

5

u/cloudypilgrim 13d ago

Don’t switch horses mid-stream… worst fucking logic that was broadly accepted. “Yeah, he made a huge mistake, better stick with him.”

3

u/matthewmcg 13d ago

Don’t forget the NYTimes and Washington Post sitting on the illegal warantless wiretapping stories for one year until after the election. https://www.salon.com/2006/08/14/times_24/

→ More replies (25)

1.9k

u/WatchItAllBurn1 13d ago

There is also a chance that in bush' second election that there were some genuine problems

  • 54% of votes discarded in Florida were African americans

  • in the same election, Ohio made it harder and less accessible for African Americans and poor communities to vote too.

While these were ultimately rejected by the republican congress at the time. It does not change the fact that Bush only won the popular vote by 0.7%.

785

u/Glorthiar 13d ago edited 13d ago

This is why we should stop letting states decide how their votes are counted and sent in, because they cheat for their own teams. The feds should go to every god damn state and count the votes without those states being allow to fuck with it, states themselves are commiting election fraud openly without consequence.

132

u/BlueBloodLive 13d ago

Little bit off topic but as an outsider this whole continual redrawing of districts seems so dodgy. Making it so there are more white Republicans than black Democrats and using little sneaky tricks to get as many red districts as possible.

It seems they need to basically keep moving the goalposts just for them to have any chance at winning, yet they cry to the heavens about elections being rigged. Shameless shower of arseholes.

85

u/h0tfr1es 13d ago

Redistricting by itself isn’t bad, gerrymandering is. In California, we don’t do gerrymandering, there’s a committee of four Democrats, four Republicans, and two independents that all have to work together to redistrict the maps.

58

u/VonThirstenberg 13d ago

And that's precisely how those maps should be drawn everywhere, through bipartisan compromise and agreement.

Sensible policy if you ask me.

45

u/argv_minus_one 13d ago

I disagree. Those maps should be drawn by an open-source algorithm using publicly-available data, not by human politicians.

25

u/RemedyofRevenge 13d ago

I agree with the intention, but then who gets to write that code/create the algorithm? And of those written/created, who gets to decide which one is the "fairest?" What are the emergency valves when the algorithm does something unintentional? What if the code written is sabotaged, and can we depend on our usual tech illiterate electorate to know when something is wrong, and how to solve it?

Not to say its a bad idea in itself, but the buck has to stop somewhere in having someone make a decision, a human decision on how these districts are drawn. A human using a digital code to draw it is still a product of human decision making.

→ More replies (3)

45

u/I_am_the_Jukebox 13d ago

Eh...having an "algorithm" figure it out isn't a panacea. After all, someone writes the algorithm. All that does is shift the responsibility to a black box that only a few people know how it actually works, and give the illusion of impartiality when algorithms often operate on the biases we give them.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/mrmastermimi 13d ago

the idea that computers and algorithms are immune to bias is dangerous. algorithms are just as fallible to human bias as we are. algorithms are, after all, created by people and trained on data created by people..

however, unlike us, algorithms don't have the ability to address nuanced context unless specifically programmed to do so.

there are certain districts that are gerrymandered in order to preserve specific minority voices in Congress, specifically to keep predominantly black communities to be grouped in their own district instead of spreading them between other districts.(this process, while allowed under the Voters Right Act, has been abused before in order to further dilute black communities' representation. most southern states with large black populations tend to abuse it)

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/BlueBloodLive 13d ago

That's the word I was looking for, gerrymandering, couldn't remember it!

I'm not too familiar with it but from what I've seen Republicans will use it at every opportunity to better their chances.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/Glorthiar 13d ago

Seems dodgy? It's openly and blatantly treasonous. Redrawing districts with the express purpose of removing political power from the people is betraying democracy, and the people who do it should have to pay for their crimes.

Treason is a monumental crime, because it is destroying the very foundation of our democracy and ruining the lives of hundreds of millions. A crime for which their can be no justice, only a vicious and ugly punishment to dissuade future traitors.

7

u/BlueBloodLive 13d ago

Is it ever challenged or pushed back against? Democrats should be all over that, no? Or at the very least making voters aware of it.

Again I'm not top up on the workings of it all but I'm surprised it's not a huge issue that gets a lot of attention.

11

u/Glorthiar 13d ago

I have been hearing people fighting over gerrymandering my entire life, it's one of the go to examples wer were taught I highschool of how system of government are corrupted.

And I went to highschool in fucking TEXAS

10

u/Ok-Champ-5854 13d ago

Yes many states will send it to a court which can say no and make them do it over again. It's one of the reasons Republicans have been packing courts for years.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

317

u/WatchItAllBurn1 13d ago edited 13d ago

But why would the republican party ever agree to that? They literally cannot win elections without doing shady shit to the extreme.

75

u/[deleted] 13d ago Gold

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/HawkeyGawds 13d ago

If society was a Dashiell Hammett short story

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

8

u/SuperMegaTrev64 13d ago

I mean, Rs could actually try:

  1. Not being so extreme.
  2. Persuading voters instead of the BS they shove down Fox News viewers’ throats.
  3. Functional, real governing when in power.
  4. Look to the future of the country and not just cater to old, rich, white people.

But 🤷🏻‍♂️

15

u/SkollFenrirson 13d ago

They've said as much themselves

→ More replies (4)

51

u/DapperStatistician59 13d ago

The voting rights act would have helped stop this. But Kristen Sinema and Joe Manchin went to Republicans to kill the bill. They even high fived about it at the rich people meeting they have over in Switzerland or whatever. It was brought up. They were given great applause for blocking that bill. Traitors.

24

u/Glorthiar 13d ago edited 13d ago

You think they would high five if they saw the hordes of people they fucking betrayed agrilly marching up their doorstep demanding retribution?

12

u/RolledUhhp 13d ago

"If the humans cannot stop this, we will. Neigh, we must."

5

u/DigitalUnlimited 13d ago

Stomp three times if you agree

11

u/Mixedpopreferences 13d ago edited 13d ago

"Look at all those agrilly horses!"
pause
"Fuck yeah!"
high five

7

u/Glorthiar 13d ago

That was indeed, a very funny typo. I do wonder how many horses it would end up being

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DapperStatistician59 13d ago

I wonder....I sure do. I think they will be singing a different tune. I'm not sure what it's gonna take for people to hold their Senators accountable. They won't even vote out Known scoundrels.

7

u/h0tfr1es 13d ago

I mean, what’s the worst that could happen to them? They lose their seat? They still have the same benefits (because it’s for life) and they get to be highly-paid lobbyists/consultants instead.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/stycky-keys 13d ago

Unfortunately the supreme court basically decided against thatrecently

10

u/Glorthiar 13d ago

If they keep Making ruling like this people are going to take away their right to rule on anything, were crawling up to a new age, a d these openly corrupt cocky bastards are not going to be pleased watching their halls of lies and reason turned to ash

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (24)

47

u/PaltryCharacter 13d ago

Also in 2004 Bush artificially raised the terror alert level just before the election.

https://swampland.time.com/2009/08/20/color-coded-con-job/

26

u/sbubgw 13d ago

And it was a re-election during wartimes. Tough when it’s that stacked

17

u/PaltryCharacter 13d ago

Yep. Which is even more infuriating because the entire war was based on a lie.

3

u/TheMadPyro 13d ago

But in fairness, what a strategy.

Start a war for no good reason, convince people it was a good idea, and then get re-elected because you’re in the middle of said war.

Obviously it was bullshit but it’s not like they half-assed their way through those 8 years.

8

u/Diarygirl 13d ago

Those terror alerts became a joke. "Oh, we're on orange alert? What's the Bush Administration trying to distract us from this time?"

19

u/theYetiDidIt 13d ago

Bush won the second election because we were at peak American fervor after 9/11 and everyone wanted terrorists dead in a crater. simple as that.

4

u/RSCasual 13d ago

Looks like it wasn't just that either, red states make an effort to suppress voter turn out in poor and black areas (like always), meaning that even when the country is in that state they still need to cheat for him to win by less than 1%

3

u/theYetiDidIt 13d ago

Gerrymandering and voter suppression is definitely historical.

43

u/Lady_von_Stinkbeaver 13d ago

The bullshit Swift Boaters, who didn't even bother to make a token appearance protesting Kerry's nomination for Secretary of State.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/_c_manning 13d ago

All caps FUCK the GOP. full stop.

I truly hate this so much.

→ More replies (7)

559

u/SolomonCRand 13d ago

Silent majority = minority of the population that has loudly complained about every thing that they find more than mildly frustrating for the last two decades

156

u/KecemotRybecx 13d ago

For real. They bitch constantly.

60

u/RedditAdminsLoveRUS 13d ago

"eVeRyBoDy gEtS a tRoPhY tHeSe dAyS!!!"

27

u/Americrazy 13d ago

‘Imma buy a shit ton of ‘bUd LiGhT’ and set it ON FIRE to show the woke corporate elite!!’

→ More replies (1)

12

u/B_R_U_H 13d ago

Look at me! Look ✌️👀 I’m the victim now!

→ More replies (1)

54

u/808ocd 13d ago

silent = oppressed, victimized

majority = powerful

in their fantasy, they are powerful victims. fascist double speak

15

u/kitsunewarlock 13d ago

The only thing "silent" about them is the empty tracts of land and tumbleweeds that get to choose our supreme court justices.

→ More replies (4)

277

u/VolatileUtopian 13d ago

I remember around Obama's first term looking up the different political parties in the US and I noticed that the Democrats had way more registered members than the Republicans and that's when I learned about gerrymandering.

88

u/Professional-Box4153 13d ago

They also outright lie. When I registered to vote at 18, I was asked my political party. I selected "independent" because at the time I thought it meant non-affiliated. I later got a mailer in the mail thanking me for joining the Independent Republican Party (whatever the hell that means). I left it alone because I really didn't care that much at that age. When I actually went to vote, I was told by an official that I was not allowed to vote across party lines. I could ONLY vote for the Republican candidate since I was registered as Republican. I chose not to vote instead.

102

u/quetzalcoatlsghost 13d ago

You can only vote in the republican PRIMARY.

It's not true that you can't vote democrat in an actual election if you register Republican. All the candidates are on the same ballot, no one could stop you.

46

u/Professional-Box4153 13d ago

I was young and honestly didn't even know that there were other races.

33

u/quetzalcoatlsghost 13d ago

Oh yea sorry, didn't mean any offense. Just wanted to clarify for people that might not know WHY you said republicans are liars. Some people who responded to you didn't seem to know that.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/AntiparticleCollider 13d ago

Is that universal? That's wild to me. If I registered to vote and they asked which party I'm with, my response would be none of your facking business

2

u/Joshatron121 13d ago

They were likely trying to vote in a primary in this anecdote. You can't vote in a primary for a party you aren't registered with and the ballot is for that party only. For a normal election they don't know who you vote for since it's all the same ballot.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/stockflethoverTDS 13d ago

Yo thats how they make you vote in third world dictatorship economies

→ More replies (3)

768

u/SockPuppet-47 13d ago

Republicans...

Can't win a fair election without all the handicap advantages they're given. Without gerrymandering and the Electoral College we wouldn't be concerned at all about their shitty policies.

270

u/FitVisit4829 13d ago

One of the main reasons they're so against mail-in's and ranked choice voting.

They know for a fact they have to cheat to win in most cases, and can't actually win a fair vote to save their asses.

It's why they project so much without a shred of proof, because they know they're the ones doing it.

23

u/floatingby493 13d ago edited 13d ago

The irony is that their policies regarding voting are likely costing them votes. They want everyone to have to vote in person but many older people aren’t able to drive and wait in line to vote. They are making it harder for their base to vote.

12

u/Slyvester121 13d ago

They tend to only outlaw things like drive-in voting in city centers, which lean heavily democratic. The regulations often don't extend to rural areas.

→ More replies (1)

60

u/qb1120 13d ago

Now they're even trying to raise the voting age to 25 LMAO

54

u/yummyforehead 13d ago

Them preaching about the constitution: :)

Them when the constitution is more than just guns: >:(

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Terramagi 13d ago

Love that the voting age is going to be easier to increase than the fucking minimum wage.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/masterchief1001 13d ago

The Electoral College is the only college Republicans like

10

u/xiofar 13d ago

The entire federal government is a gerrymandered mess in favor of conservatives.

The house is over-represented by conservatives. The senate is an inherently undemocratic by design. The electoral college is a outdated joke.

We need to expand the house and give it true proportional representation.

We need to expand the Supreme Court and get rid of the travesty that are lifetime appointments.

We need to get rid of the senate where a single person can destroy any law being passed.

4

u/BZLuck 13d ago

The Electoral College is the ultimate, national gerrymandering.

→ More replies (9)

497

u/midnightgirlj 13d ago

more like "the electoral college is the only way we win" majority

105

u/DemandZestyclose7145 13d ago

I would argue the way we do the Senate is even more egregious. Every state has 2 Senators which makes zero sense. So of course the tiny red states like Wyoming and Montana get as much political power as California. Honestly if it wasn't for this and the electoral college then the Republicans would never hold power again. Which is why it will never change.

25

u/SpacemanSpleef 13d ago

Although funny enough Montana has a democrat senator. Jon Tester!

→ More replies (1)

44

u/TheTVDB 13d ago

The House remaining at 435 members for over a century is a bigger problem. The US was built on the concept that the interests of both individuals AND states should be represented at the Federal level. Obviously done by loosely tying House members to the population, Senate members to states, and the Presidency to a combination of both. Except the power of the population in smaller states is heavily skewed because the number of House members has remained fixed at 435 and because electoral votes are varied based on number of Representatives and not Senators. This results in the issue you're describing more than Senate representation.

If you adjust the number of House members upwards, then electoral votes will more closely align with popular vote.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/scoopzthepoopz 13d ago

It's to keep their interests in the game. Except that's not the reality at all. They can hijack the entire nation's progress by holding out, and the gop has formed a voting bloc including your Dakotas and Montanas.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (24)

5

u/Watch_me_give 13d ago

Inb4 morons claim land should vote not people.

Screw the EC.

→ More replies (7)

57

u/SaltChildhood7 13d ago

And 2004 was only because we were in the middle of a war

35

u/_userclone 13d ago

An illegitimate war started by the “winner” of the 2000 election, even.

12

u/SaltChildhood7 13d ago

Yes - in hindsight. But at that time 2003, we were bent on destroying and revenge

11

u/_userclone 13d ago

Many of us wanted more (read: any) proof that Saddam had WMDs before launching a full-scale invasion.

6

u/SaltChildhood7 13d ago

That is when Powell trotted out the little vial of all purpose flour at the UN. Such a farce.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

232

u/qwertycantread 13d ago

This statistic really highlights why the current Supreme Court has no validity.

72

u/Mattress_Of_Needles 13d ago

This is one of the worst side effects of their fuckery. Don't learn how to play the game, learn how to game the system.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/PoopMobile9000 13d ago

A majority that only exists because SCOTUS stole the election in 2000 and handed it to Bush.

15

u/Padaca 13d ago

They're as valid as the institution that empowers them...

Do with that info what you will.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

38

u/killing31 13d ago

The argument I always see for the electoral college is that without it, the candidates would only concentrate on California and New York. But currently, they only concentrate on a few swing states with fewer people. How is that logical?

15

u/ShakespearIsKing 13d ago

Why campaign in states where more people live instead of swing states where less people live?

Logic!

9

u/Relyst 13d ago

California has more Republicans than Texas, Texas has more Democrats than New York, New York has more Republicans than the 11 least populated Republican states combined. Never mind that the reasoning Hamilton gave for creating the electoral college was that the average person was too stupid to make an informed choice. Supporting the electoral college is the equivalent of thinking you're a fucking moron.

8

u/awfulmcnofilter 13d ago

With the internet all of that state specific campaigning is ridiculous anyway.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/OldGuto 13d ago

"Democracy" in action.

24

u/Upper-Job5130 13d ago

Had a Democrat been president in 2001, then 2004 would be on the blue side, not the red. The only reason he won the popular vote was an increase in national pride as a result of the response to the 9/11 attacks (IMHO)

→ More replies (1)

20

u/Frisky_Potato42nite 13d ago edited 13d ago

We need to abolish the Electoral College and have ranked-choice voting. The person with the most votes by the public wins - simple and classically democratic.

→ More replies (1)

82

u/Roofies666 13d ago

GW really had that folksy charm, didn't he? People wanted to get a beer with him and thought he was an alright dude so that made up for all the war crimes and awful shit he signed off on while president.

Cool, cool, cool, so very cool.

51

u/OnTheFenceGuy 13d ago

It was more about the “Patriotism” the country was still feeling, and the fact that the Iraq War seemed to be going well.

19

u/gundumb08 13d ago

This. He was a "wartime President" and that carried his votes. And in 2004 we still had no idea there were no WMDs in Iraq (there was still a decent sized pushback as people thought it distracted from the actual War in Afghanistan).

It was simply a "don't rock the boat" scenario; plus that Swiftboat BS and some Voting Law shenanigans didn't help.

9

u/808ocd 13d ago

it was nationalism. nationalism.

15

u/ThePaddysPubSheriff 13d ago

If I was a warmonger with no morals I'd absolutely have a beer with the guy

16

u/Mapsachusetts 13d ago

Unfortunately for all the immoral warmongers, he hasn’t drank since 1986. But you can always go hunting with Cheney instead!

6

u/ThePaddysPubSheriff 13d ago

I tell you what, you can always bet on something interesting happening when you chill with R's

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/_soul_of_chogokin_ 13d ago

The Electoral College needs to go.

87

u/picklesdoggo 13d ago

The ordering of the years is awful

49

u/bunglejerry 13d ago

Reverse sequential order, top to bottom.

But it winds up looking totally random. It's an eyesore.

8

u/I_am_Daesomst 13d ago

It's better now that I read your comment - if it were truly just random someone should have been fired, re-hired and fired again for the effect.

57

u/OGRube 13d ago

Fuck the electoral college. One citizen one vote. What’s the problem?

9

u/TheChiBanana 13d ago

Yes! Get rid of the electoral college! And gerrymandering

45

u/oneeyejedi 13d ago

The problem is the rich would lose. Remember America is less a democracy and more a plutocracy

11

u/internet_commie 13d ago

Oiligarchy.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (30)

9

u/jpa7252 13d ago edited 13d ago

Imagine how much better off we would be as a country without the electoral college, gerrymandering, voter suppression and election undermining, without Bush and Trump, and all the other seats Republicans have cheated their way into?

→ More replies (5)

7

u/Financial_Month6835 13d ago

That’s why they do coups

7

u/The_Crimson-Knight 13d ago

Isn't 2004 because of Dubya and the war in the Iraq?

I'm a former Republican, brainwashed into loving Bush and hating Obama. The Dijon mustard "scandal" broke the hold on me.

6

u/districtcourt 13d ago

I'm a former Republican

Same

The Dijon mustard "scandal" broke the hold on me.

I honestly have a lot of respect for you, then partisan Republican, to be able to see through this cheap trick, and allow it to push the needle enough to break you away from the GOP. That takes an uncommonly found maturity level

→ More replies (1)

7

u/StargasmSargasm 13d ago

Somehow Republicans convinced people that John Kerry was a coward and Bush was a hero when John Kerry actually served in Nam and Bush was a draft dodger. Also the whole "Jesus told me to go to war" thing. The signs were all there. We just missed them.

19

u/AgentEndive 13d ago

"Silent" because they don't have the votes

6

u/gorillagargoyle 13d ago

Who TF lists years like that

4

u/districtcourt 13d ago

Mind boggling right

6

u/g0lfball_whacker_guy 13d ago

If the shoe was on the other foot republicans would’ve abolished the electoral college 20+ years ago. But they benefit from this broken system so it’s working perfectly for them. This is why voter apathy remains high. Democrats in red states feel like their voice is never heard and vice versa. Also the fact that college electors can change their vote leaves voters with no faith. The giant orange cum stain tried sending fake electors to change the outcome of 2020. Whole system is fucked.

15

u/dudinax 13d ago

Then in 2020, the Republican tried to overthrow the electoral college with a coup.

→ More replies (3)

23

u/captjust 13d ago

*Silenced majority

5

u/davechri 13d ago

Without the electoral college and gerrymandering republicans would be irrelevant.

5

u/dathomar 13d ago

I like to include George H W Bush, because it makes sense that he's the first post-Reagan President. That makes it 2 elections for the Republicans and 7 for the Democrats. Also, that means that, out of three Republican Presidents, two of them have lost their incumbency to a Democrat. Meanwhile, no Democrat has lost their incumbency.

5

u/myles_cassidy 13d ago

Silent majority that never shuts the fuck up

14

u/PracticableSolution 13d ago

Wrap your head around the fact that a Republican president has not been installed by popular vote since 1988. That’s 35 years ago.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Kara_lin_69 13d ago

Notice how blue won 2016 but we got a red "winner"

24

u/_userclone 13d ago

Also in 2000, the one where the state Supreme Court of the state run by the Republican candidate’s brother decided the election was over.

→ More replies (4)

10

u/Alexchii 13d ago

Isn't that the whole point of this post?

→ More replies (7)

28

u/BatmansBigBro2017 13d ago

It’s a leftover practice from the post civil war period. It needs to end. Along with a lot of archaic things we do.

34

u/Lots_o_Llamas 13d ago

We need to eliminate the electoral college, actively combat gerrymandering, institute ranked choice voting, and overturn Citizens United.

But fuck man. We can't even get people to agree on universal background checks for buying an AR-15.

7

u/Glorthiar 13d ago

Make everything these people don't cheat and steal elections what it is, a crime against democracy and every single constituent affects.

It's not just fraud, it's treason.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/silasoulman 13d ago

Here’s the elections where the wealthy lost:

3

u/taylormadevideos 13d ago

04 had a 911 boost

4

u/AcademicAd4816 13d ago

If not for 9/11 2004 wouldn’t have looked like that either

→ More replies (2)

4

u/99available 13d ago

Good luck getting the President elected by popular vote.

4

u/LordMuffin1 13d ago

Such a nice democracy. You do not win becauae you get most votes. You win because you get right votes. No wonder the republicans dont want democratic rights, they are not interested in democracy or values such as free speech or voting rights.

3

u/John97212 13d ago

There is no such thing as "the silent majority." What conservatives name that is actually "the fuckin' loud minority."

5

u/That1Guy80903 13d ago

If we abolished the Electoral College and Gerrymandering was made illegal (like it should be) Repuglicons would never hold political power again, and they know damn well that's true. They've even said it on live tv multiple times.

11

u/GracchiBroBro 13d ago

Silent Majority is actually the Overrepresented Minority

9

u/bakochba 13d ago

And 2004 is tainted because GW Bush didn't win the popular vote in 2000 so he shouldn't have even been in there.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/MrSnarf26 13d ago

More like silent majority of land mass

14

u/R3dCypher 13d ago

Five things to fix the US:

  1. All elections by popular count. (no electoral college, no more gerrymandering )

  2. Supreme Court Justices are elected for 4 year terms.

  3. All elected officials have term limits. Max 10 years as an example.

  4. No more special interests or lobbying.

  5. Elected officials can no longer actively participate in trading stocks. You choose to represent the people not your wallet.

→ More replies (5)

8

u/JG98 13d ago

Neither part of "silent majority" is true.

3

u/ralph_wiggum42 13d ago

But the landmass!

3

u/penny-wise 13d ago

The Electoral College needs to be abolished.

3

u/medium0rare 13d ago

Yeah. The issue is 100% an over represented minority. It’s gotten to a point where dems in red states just don’t vote. My vote literally doesn’t count.

3

u/humanprogression 13d ago

They can't keep this up forever.

3

u/DasNo 13d ago

This is why Republicans are against the land doesn't vote argument, it's the only way for them to stay somewhat "relevant"

3

u/FewerToysHigherWages 13d ago

And Bush only won in 2004 because of 9/11. Everyone at the time was scared shitless about terrorism and thought Rudy Giuliani was a national hero.

3

u/Valuable-Composer262 13d ago

Idk the electoral college just seems like a sham to me. Just go with the popular vote. This way everyone's vote is equal. A North Dakota vote would be equal to a California vote which is not the case right now